This quote is wrong. It’s “Once let the black man get upon his person the brass letter U.S.”, not “Once let a black man get upon his person the brass letters U.S.”
In the America other natural significant is paddy.A wee authored yap_i mean a gammae having to do it” is India Kerala. Where ther is no ion or money a sun- and some signs man abod these ways in the state.Serfiklin asks+this” I open to you a boat and rouym: Ask how Parker you bet troug this pebble as if it’s missisipi.Monoree I say. Often.. you play ibe it’s even rhymne..
So it’s mustard.. an ellocine seems while you fill from West therse torries that may spin top”!.. How you Phillip a word of premlinece to take me purse?(now the American sleeps)/ Since I say capinmcee” you bother your brother and not me mud .Jin in th cark”_₹….
However margenitly who is wit ever even say brother: gets bothered and we meet.
[“It is no longer a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but a government of Wall Street, by Wall Street, and for Wall Street.” ]
The statistic on the percentage of enslaved people in the South appears to be incorrect. The total population of the South (free plus enslaved) was 12,240,293. This means that enslaved people (3,950,511) made up about 32% of the total southern population. The figure of 45% in this paragraph seems to have been derived by dividing the enslaved population by the free population, not by the total population.
The paragraph on the Portuguese/Spanish is really misleading. Treaty of Tordesillas did not occur AFTER the riches from the New World started flowing to Spain. The Aztecs were not conquered until 1519. Also, the Doctrine of Discovery did not instruct Portugal and Spain to “treat the natives with Christian compassion.” Instead, the Pope said that they can do whatever they want to non-Christians: “They are to put them in perpetual slavery”. This becomes the legal argument to expand conquest and the US Court later uses this to argue that white Americans had the right to seize all indigenous lands.
. . . had a competent but lackadaisical managerial style that allowed Roosevelt a great deal of freedom, which he used to network with such luminaries . . .
Eliminating the repeated use of “Roosevelt” hear makes the sentence smoother and easier to read.
Recent Comments in this Document
January 17, 2022 at 4:39 pm
Hello,
Just noticed a typo here: should read, “Expansionism” (vs. Expanionism).
Best,
Nanosh
See in context
January 14, 2022 at 8:46 am
This quote is wrong. It’s “Once let the black man get upon his person the brass letter U.S.”, not “Once let a black man get upon his person the brass letters U.S.”
See in context
January 11, 2022 at 8:06 am
In the America other natural significant is paddy.A wee authored yap_i mean a gammae having to do it” is India Kerala. Where ther is no ion or money a sun- and some signs man abod these ways in the state.Serfiklin asks+this” I open to you a boat and rouym: Ask how Parker you bet troug this pebble as if it’s missisipi.Monoree I say. Often.. you play ibe it’s even rhymne..
So it’s mustard.. an ellocine seems while you fill from West therse torries that may spin top”!.. How you Phillip a word of premlinece to take me purse?(now the American sleeps)/ Since I say capinmcee” you bother your brother and not me mud .Jin in th cark”_₹….
However margenitly who is wit ever even say brother: gets bothered and we meet.
See in context
January 11, 2022 at 3:13 am
As the other person has stated, the word should be “scarring,” not “scaring.”
See in context
January 10, 2022 at 8:29 pm
[“It is no longer a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but a government of Wall Street, by Wall Street, and for Wall Street.” ]
Mary Elizabeth Lease
See in context
January 10, 2022 at 8:24 pm
The statistic on the percentage of enslaved people in the South appears to be incorrect. The total population of the South (free plus enslaved) was 12,240,293. This means that enslaved people (3,950,511) made up about 32% of the total southern population. The figure of 45% in this paragraph seems to have been derived by dividing the enslaved population by the free population, not by the total population.
See in context
January 9, 2022 at 8:33 pm
The paragraph on the Portuguese/Spanish is really misleading. Treaty of Tordesillas did not occur AFTER the riches from the New World started flowing to Spain. The Aztecs were not conquered until 1519. Also, the Doctrine of Discovery did not instruct Portugal and Spain to “treat the natives with Christian compassion.” Instead, the Pope said that they can do whatever they want to non-Christians: “They are to put them in perpetual slavery”. This becomes the legal argument to expand conquest and the US Court later uses this to argue that white Americans had the right to seize all indigenous lands.
See in context
January 9, 2022 at 6:48 pm
Agreed.
See in context
January 9, 2022 at 6:48 pm
Just a comment on font size for this chapter. The font sizes are all over the place. Would be easier to read with standardized font sizes. Thank you.
See in context
January 9, 2022 at 6:14 pm
. . . had a competent but lackadaisical managerial style that allowed Roosevelt a great deal of freedom, which he used to network with such luminaries . . .
Eliminating the repeated use of “Roosevelt” hear makes the sentence smoother and easier to read.
See in context