I have a question about your post. How did you come up with the conclusion of who the person you replied to was talking about when he said that they overdosed. Based on your post I assume you are talking about George Floyd, but this cannot be concluded from the post that you replied to.

why in the world would you make a person’s comment have “moderation.” This is the second time on this same person This sounds like censorship and since the above post is also 4 years old like the first one by this person on chapter 58 it just doesn’t make sense. 

why in the world would you make a person’s comment have “moderation.” This sounds like censorship and since the above post is 4 years old it just doesn’t make sense. There may be a plausible reason, but it seems like a bad move for a history book because if you are trying to censor people you cannot be trusted. Then again we already can’t trust you from your actions in the first few paragraphs which I won’t go into because it was already commented extensively by others.

When it says that control of the Panama Canal was “returned” it gives a false sense that Panama had ever previously controlled the canal. The canal was owned by built, and operated almost exclusively by United States.

Where it says that the US returned the Panama Canal this is not true. For the whole existence of the Panama Canal until this point the Canal was the US’s. The workers that built the canal were US citizens. The land also was owned by the US. I believe this would be worth mentioning because the way it is currently stated is factually incorrect.

Naomi and Allison were here!

In the current short cut/headings listing(I. Introduction

II. American Politics before September 11, 2001
III. September 11 and the War on Terror…) Conclusion, Primary Sources and Reference Material are all 2 numerals off. IX vs XI, X vs XII and XI vs XIII

la neta, la neta, se paso estados unidos con mexico, just my opinion

This paragraph shows how destroyed the South was after the Civil War, not just physically but socially and politically too. I think the questions at the end are important because Reconstruction was not only about rebuilding roads and governments, but also deciding what freedom would actually mean for formerly enslaved people.

You should be careful when including the #MeToo movement. Whenever you start making the act of blaming people for sexual assault a trend, it is extremely dangerous. I don’t defend sexual assault, but there will always be “victims” who are really just bad actors wanting attention. Additionally, the #MeToo movement was a failure and should be disregarded in history. It’s a failure because it sets the condition that consent is the only thing that determines sexual abuse. We know that there is a lot more that goes into sexual abuse, rather than just someone saying they consent.